<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ACCOZZAGLIA &#187; Sound Transit &#124; ACCOZZAGLIA</title>
	<atom:link href="https://accozzaglia.ca/tag/sound-transit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://accozzaglia.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 16:56:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>why two rails per track is practically better than one.</title>
		<link>https://accozzaglia.ca/livejournal/why-two-rails-per-track-is-practically-better-than-one/</link>
		<comments>https://accozzaglia.ca/livejournal/why-two-rails-per-track-is-practically-better-than-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astrid Idlewild]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LiveJournal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LRT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monorail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sound Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://accozzaglia.ca/uncategorized/why-two-rails-per-track-is-practically-better-than-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://accozzaglia.ca/livejournal/why-two-rails-per-track-is-practically-better-than-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
