Cover Page i [Table of Contents] Page ii [Table of Authorities] Page iii [Table of Authorities] Page 1 [Legal Issues] Page 2 [Statement of the Case] Page 3 Page 4 [Summary of the Facts] Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 [Argument: I. Standard of Review] Page 13 [Argument: II. The Court of Appeals Correctly Held That Goins Demonstrated Direct Evidence of Sexual Orientation Discrimination] Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 [Argument: III. The Court of Appeals Decision Is Consistent with the Legislative Intent of the MHRA and There Are No Internal Conflicts in the Law] Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 [Argument: IV. A Workable Standard Is Set Forth by the MHRA and the Court of Appeals] Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 [Argument: V. The Court of Appeals Correctly Held That A Material Question of Fact Is at Issue for Hostile Environment Discrimination] Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 [Conclusion]