Respondent’s Brief
State of Minnesota in Supreme Court, Julienne Goins (Respondent) v. West Group (Appellant) [CX-00-706]
[ DOWNLOAD PDF ]
![Page i [Table of Contents]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.2.jpg)
![Page ii [Table of Authorities]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.3.jpg)
![Page iii [Table of Authorities]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.4.jpg)
![Page 1 [Legal Issues]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.5.jpg)
![Page 2 [Statement of the Case]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.6.jpg)
![Page 4 [Summary of the Facts]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.8.jpg)
![Page 12 [Argument: I. Standard of Review]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.16.jpg)
![Page 13 [Argument: II. The Court of Appeals Correctly Held That Goins Demonstrated Direct Evidence of Sexual Orientation Discrimination]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.17.jpg)
![Page 29 [Argument: III. The Court of Appeals Decision Is Consistent with the Legislative Intent of the MHRA and There Are No Internal Conflicts in the Law]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.33.jpg)
![Page 32 [Argument: IV. A Workable Standard Is Set Forth by the MHRA and the Court of Appeals]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.36.jpg)
![Page 35 [Argument: V. The Court of Appeals Correctly Held That A Material Question of Fact Is at Issue for Hostile Environment Discrimination]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.39.jpg)
![Page 40 [Conclusion]](https://accozzaglia.ca/wp-content/uploads/gvwg1.003.44.jpg)
Accozzaglia
On scholarship, reconciliation, survival, and agency.